Assets
Forum Home Members New Posts Search

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Forum › CryENGINE 2 › Showcase Gallery › Assets › Remote Nuke with full physics incl. Blastwave


Post a new topicPost a reply Go to page 1  2  Next 
Previous topic | Next topic 
XquZ  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 14.01.2008, 19:11Posts: 5Location: Germany Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic: Remote Nuke with full physics incl. Blastwave
PostPosted 15.01.2008, 22:23 
Heres my remote nuke bomb.

the nuke replaces the c4 bomb (next version will be "standalone" ;) ).

its alot more powerful than the TAC nukes in crysis, or every crysis nuke I(!) have seen ´till now.

the physics act almost like in the Cryengine 2 Techdemo, but i´m still tweaking.


heres a vid from the downloadable version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h20LS_LRRUE
http://www.stage6.com/user/XquZ/video/2079626/final-remote-nuke-Crysis-full-physics-inc-blastwave-REALTIME


Download:
http://rapidshare.com/files/84079511/Remote_Nuke.rar

1. extract with winrar

2. copy the game folder in your crysis folder, overwrite.



greetz XquZ!


Last edited by XquZ on 15.01.2008, 23:35, edited 1 time in total.
huetze  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 01.01.2008, 05:08Posts: 13Location: Germany Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 15.01.2008, 23:22 
cool :easter:
FAlcom  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 14.01.2008, 19:20Posts: 1 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 15.01.2008, 23:28 
Nice Men !!
User avatar Duruk  Uber Modder Uber ModderMember since: 29.12.2007, 12:38Posts: 1180Location: The Netherlands, Boxmeer Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 16.01.2008, 17:54 
Cool great work. Its huge on framerate but fun to play with.

thanks

I just love standing in the blastwave:
Image

Solid Tutorial
Portfolio
ImageImageImage

Last edited by Duruk on 16.01.2008, 17:59, edited 1 time in total.
Suilenroc  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 05.01.2008, 21:40Posts: 5 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 16.01.2008, 20:44 
Hehe, I've been using this in some custom levels of mine. As soon as I hit the boombutton, my framerate TANKS. Well, not actually the framerate, it stays in the 20s-30s, but the game slows down to the equivalent of .5FPS
User avatar ChaosWolf  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 26.11.2007, 05:10Posts: 60Location: London Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 19.01.2008, 03:20 
Nice! :]

__________________________________________________________________________
8800GTS 320MB, CORE:600, MEMORY:900, SHADER:500

Q6600 @ 3GHZ

3GB RAM

Crysis plays at 27-49 fps and never drops below 23
Warboy  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 08.01.2008, 03:33Posts: 35 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 21.01.2008, 18:03 
Can you apply these effects to the TAC gun?
User avatar TYRANICK  Trained Modder Trained ModderMember since: 05.11.2007, 21:28Posts: 369Location: England Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 21.01.2008, 19:16 
Quote:
Originally posted by Warboy
Can you apply these effects to the TAC gun?


Thats what i was thinking.

Dam we need people like you XquZ for rad's project lol

Actually after testing it... maybe not.

No offense dude but its impossible to replicate this in real time, everything just freezes and even by turning that cvar off still lags me down to like 2 fps :(

Why? Is the engine just not capable of rendering it all? Or do out PCS still suck? lol

Q6600 @ 2.4ghz| 8800GTS 512MB G92 @ 700/2050 Stable| Crucial Ballistix (2x1GB) RAM stock

Last edited by TYRANICK on 21.01.2008, 19:58, edited 1 time in total.
XquZ  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 14.01.2008, 19:11Posts: 5Location: Germany Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 22.01.2008, 05:43 
i´m still working on that...

the problem is, that really EVERYTHING gets destroyed.... thats just to much for our cpu´s...

i´ve got a core2duo e6400 and it´s impossible to use this nuke on a crysis singleplayer map for example... but it runs alot better on a real highend cpu, like my brother´s core 2 quad with 4x 3.0 ghz....


@warboy: sure, thats no problem, but i´m trying to make that a little more cpu friendly first :D
User avatar MWLL|Death_Grin  Hardcore Modder Hardcore ModderMember since: 16.10.2007, 23:13Posts: 884Location: Iowa, USA Likes: 1
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 22.01.2008, 05:56 
Yeah its way to much for any modern CPU to handle unless you had a dedicated physics card- assuming the engine even supports it. Thats why I would assum cryteks nuke isn't like the one in the tech demo (thats why its called a Tech Demo..demoing their tech not ours, lol)

Image
Warboy  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 08.01.2008, 03:33Posts: 35 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 22.01.2008, 06:43 
Quote:
Originally posted by XquZ
i´m still working on that...

the problem is, that really EVERYTHING gets destroyed.... thats just to much for our cpu´s...

i´ve got a core2duo e6400 and it´s impossible to use this nuke on a crysis singleplayer map for example... but it runs alot better on a real highend cpu, like my brother´s core 2 quad with 4x 3.0 ghz....


@warboy: sure, thats no problem, but i´m trying to make that a little more cpu friendly first :D


Don't worry about it, I have a Q6600 running at 3.85Ghz. And Plenty of power to push anything you throw at me.

I run Ultra High Settings @ 1280x720 with 8xQ AA and i get 30-40 FPS.

So I can handle it.


Last edited by Warboy on 22.01.2008, 06:44, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar TYRANICK  Trained Modder Trained ModderMember since: 05.11.2007, 21:28Posts: 369Location: England Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 26.01.2008, 03:30 
Wtf? You can have this thing blow the sh't out of "island" and not make it slow down your comp at all?

So you got your CPU clocked to 3.85 there;s no way you can handle this nuke espeically at those settings...I DEMAND PROOF! lol :D.

Sys_phys_cpu 0 or 1 its either 40fps with physics lag or 3 fps with physics lag...i dont understand how my FPS stays high by everything just...lags ?(

Q6600 @ 2.4ghz| 8800GTS 512MB G92 @ 700/2050 Stable| Crucial Ballistix (2x1GB) RAM stock

Last edited by TYRANICK on 26.01.2008, 03:31, edited 2 times in total.
Warboy  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 08.01.2008, 03:33Posts: 35 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 26.01.2008, 15:54 
Quote:
Originally posted by TYRANICK
Wtf? You can have this thing blow the sh't out of "island" and not make it slow down your comp at all?

So you got your CPU clocked to 3.85 there;s no way you can handle this nuke espeically at those settings...I DEMAND PROOF! lol :D.

Sys_phys_cpu 0 or 1 its either 40fps with physics lag or 3 fps with physics lag...i dont understand how my FPS stays high by everything just...lags ?(


Image
Records:
3DMark01 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_4"]71278[/url]
3DMark03 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_3"]48150[/url]
3DMark05 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_2"]22883[/url]
3DMark06 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_1"]15861[/url]
SuperPI 1m - [url="http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1927/4188ge1.png"]12.109s[/url] SuperPI 32m - [url="http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8159/32m3oc1.png"]12m 25.469[/url]
Current OS Systems: Mac OS X 10.4.9, Windows Vista 64-Bit Ultimate, Linux Ubuntu 64-bit, Windows XP SP3.

and You saw my test video with Rad's nukes, I didn't get any major slowdowns with it :P
User avatar TYRANICK  Trained Modder Trained ModderMember since: 05.11.2007, 21:28Posts: 369Location: England Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 26.01.2008, 19:31 
Quote:
Originally posted by Warboy
Quote:
Originally posted by TYRANICK
Wtf? You can have this thing blow the sh't out of "island" and not make it slow down your comp at all?

So you got your CPU clocked to 3.85 there;s no way you can handle this nuke espeically at those settings...I DEMAND PROOF! lol :D.

Sys_phys_cpu 0 or 1 its either 40fps with physics lag or 3 fps with physics lag...i dont understand how my FPS stays high by everything just...lags ?(


Image
Records:
3DMark01 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_4"]71278[/url]
3DMark03 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_3"]48150[/url]
3DMark05 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_2"]22883[/url]
3DMark06 - [url="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=3682260_1"]15861[/url]
SuperPI 1m - [url="http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1927/4188ge1.png"]12.109s[/url] SuperPI 32m - [url="http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8159/32m3oc1.png"]12m 25.469[/url]
Current OS Systems: Mac OS X 10.4.9, Windows Vista 64-Bit Ultimate, Linux Ubuntu 64-bit, Windows XP SP3.

and You saw my test video with Rad's nukes, I didn't get any major slowdowns with it :P


Well yeah I could handle that easily too.

But this nuke there's something majorlly wrong...I know it blasts everything...but I tried doing it on the "physics" map since thats small and everything just goes slow mod, fps stays tight but you know...the game just slows down.

Them links dont work :P

425x9 @ 3.83ghz...Is that safe? I didnt know you could clock a q6600 by that much lol
Hmm some nice cooling there.
Wait an 8500 and a 6400 ? I thought you needed exactly the same RAM in each of the slots
And with that moniter and no SLI either...pretty nice dude. stock gpu clocks im guessing.

Well something tells me that overclocking will get me nowhere...

Im gonna try on a different map...maybe the physics map is just messed up somehow.

Are you using sys_phys_ 1 or 0 ?

Q6600 @ 2.4ghz| 8800GTS 512MB G92 @ 700/2050 Stable| Crucial Ballistix (2x1GB) RAM stock
Soviet  Beginner BeginnerMember since: 30.01.2008, 20:15Posts: 3 Likes: 0
 
 Post Topic:
PostPosted 31.01.2008, 22:12 
This is by far one of craziest nukes I have ever seen.